Variability in the pre-analytical stages influences microbiome laboratory analyses
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Segal, Jonathan P
Al-Hassi, Hafid Omar
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractIntroduction: There are numerous confounding variables in the pre-analytical steps in the analysis of gut microbial composition that affect data consistency and reproducibility. This study compared two DNA extraction methods from the same faecal samples to analyse differences in microbial composition. Methods: DNA was extracted from 20 faecal samples using either (A) chemical/enzymatic heat lysis (lysis buffer, proteinase K, 95 °C + 70 °C) or (B) mechanical and chemical/enzymatic heat lysis (bead-beating, lysis buffer, proteinase K, 65 °C). Gut microbiota was mapped through the 16S rRNA gene (V3–V9) using a set of pre-selected DNA probes targeting >300 bacteria on different taxonomic levels. Apart from the pre-analytical DNA extraction technique, all other parameters including microbial analysis remained the same. Bacterial abundance and deviations in the microbiome were compared between the two methods. Results: Significant variation in bacterial abundance was seen between the different DNA extraction techniques, with a higher yield of species noted in the combined mechanical and heat lysis technique (B). The five predominant bacteria seen in both (A) and (B) were Bacteroidota spp. and Prevotella spp. (p = NS), followed by Bacillota (p = 0.005), Lachhnospiraceae (p = 0.0001), Veillonella spp. (p < 0.0001) and Clostridioides (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: As microbial testing becomes more easily and commercially accessible, a unified international consensus for optimal sampling and DNA isolation procedures must be implemented for robustness and reproducibility of the results.
CitationKumar A, Gravdal K, Segal JP, Steed H, Brookes MJ, Al-Hassi HO. (2022) Variability in the Pre-Analytical Stages Influences Microbiome Laboratory Analyses. Genes, 13(6):1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13061069
PubMed ID35741831 (pubmed)
Description© 2022 The Authors. Published by MDPI. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence. The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13061069
SponsorsThis study was supported by the Research Investment Fund-4 (RIF4) from the University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY UK.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licence for published version: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
- Variability in the Pre-Analytical Stages Influences Microbiome Laboratory Analyses.
- Authors: Kumar A, Gravdal K, Segal JP, Steed H, Brookes MJ, Al-Hassi HO
- Issue date: 2022 Jun 15
- The yield and quality of cellular and bacterial DNA extracts from human oral rinse samples are variably affected by the cell lysis methodology.
- Authors: Sohrabi M, Nair RG, Samaranayake LP, Zhang L, Zulfiker AH, Ahmetagic A, Good D, Wei MQ
- Issue date: 2016 Mar
- Impact of Bead-Beating Intensity on the Genus- and Species-Level Characterization of the Gut Microbiome Using Amplicon and Complete 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.
- Authors: Zhang B, Brock M, Arana C, Dende C, van Oers NS, Hooper LV, Raj P
- Issue date: 2021
- Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples.
- Authors: Sjöberg F, Nookaew I, Yazdanshenas S, Gio-Batta M, Adlerberth I, Wold AE
- Issue date: 2020 Oct